Wednesday, 31 October 2012

FEATURE: The Assorted Buffery Halloween Special

Halloween is a fantastic time of year; you can legitimately beg your neighbours for sweets whilst dressed up in a ridiculous costume, drinking cider is encouraged and competitively carving pumpkins to make yours the best is practically the law. It's also the perfect time of year to settle down and watch a horror film or two... or three, or four. So we've decided to put together a list of the 31 films (see what we did there?) we would choose to watch on All Hallow's Eve in no particular order; they're not necessarily the most well-made, the scariest or the best film ever in a multi-exclamation mark kind of way, they're just ones that we enjoy greatly. We've split it between the two of us, so you can see whether Jen or Becky have selected the film to the left of the title because, as with all such lists, these are our personal choices (and we don't necessarily agree with each other half of the time). Happy Halloween!

Becky: Halloween (1978)

If you are looking for a film to watch on the 31st October, there really is no better place to start than John Carpenter's Halloween. With one of the best and creepiest film scores, a seemingly unstoppable villain and the Scream Queen herself, Jamie Lee Curtis, Halloween is still surprisingly unsettling, particularly the masked opening sequence. It's also the film that sets the rules for your standard slasher film; anyone who has sex, smokes or drinks whilst babysitting is almost certainly guaranteed to get stuck with the pointy end of the Shape's kitchen knife. Compared to the gore and spectacle of later horrors, Halloween can seem rather tame but if you wanted to see where the modern slasher hit its stride, than look no further than the babysitter killer, Michael Myers.




Jen: The Exorcist (1973)

If you haven’t already seen it, do so immediately. If you’re a horror fan and you haven’t already seen it – for shame! This is one film you simply cannot not see, if you’ll excuse the double negative. Released in 1973, it has been a legend ever since, regularly appearing in Top 100 lists as well as paving the way for countless more exorcism films- a few of which are also on this list. As a mother enlists the help of two local priests in order to save her possessed daughter from the demons within, this film is more unnerving than scary, and shocking rather than especially gory. It also isn’t, and never has been, a film you’ll forget about in a hurry.

B: Night of the Living Dead (1968)

Night of the Living Dead is the daddy of all zombie movies, kickstarting the sub-genre and was groundbreaking in so many ways, tying in political and social issues in with all the flesh-consumption. The context of the film adds to the incredibly tense atmosphere with radio and television broadcasts suggesting everything from radiation to mass assassination. It may as well have COLD WAR PARANOIA stamped across its decaying, half-chewed forehead. Shot mainly in one house, it's incredibly claustrophobic and all the more effective for the lack of showy special effects. Perhaps most importantly, as with all good horrors, this is a human drama, a story of survival despite social differences and conflicting attitudes which is what makes its infamous ending all the more brilliant and tragic. He's coming for you Barbara… 


J: The Wicker Man (1973)

Without a doubt one of the weirdest, most psychologically bizarre films ever dreamt up, The Wickerman is the cult classic to end all cult classics. When a police sergeant is sent to a remote Scottish island in search of a missing girl, he finds far more than he bargained for in the island’s sinister pagan inhabitants, and particularly in their leader, Lord Summerisle – a character the film’s star, Christopher Lee describes as his all-time favourite role. Downright odd and decidedly creepy, this is well worth a watch any night of the year, let alone Halloween. 


B: 28 Days Later (2002)

28 Days Later is one of many horror films about the perils of scientific experimentation and although (as many a film geek will happily point out) the sprinting Infected aren't actually zombies, they certainly give their more cumbersome predecessors a run for their money on scare-factor. With its iconic scenes of a deserted, ruined London to the ridiculously tense finale, Danny Boyle's film is simply brilliant from start to finish, despite the notable shift for the last act of the film. It's helped in no small part by the fantastic performances given by Cillian Murphy, Naomie Harris and Christopher Eccleston as some of the survivors, each reacting to the collapse of civilisation in their own unique way. It also gets points for some of the best graffiti seen in a film: 'The end is well and truly fucking nigh' indeed. 


J: The Omen (1976)

Just to be absolutely clear, we’re referencing the original on this list. Not that we have anything in particular against more recent remakes- apart from the fact that the original is better, of course. Born with an alarming ‘666’ birthmark, strange incidents begin to occur around Damien, the son of American Ambassador Robert Thorn’s, who adopted the child at birth after his own was stillborn, without the knowledge of his wife, Katharine. As the death toll around the child rises, local photographer Jennings begins to notice tiny hints in photographs, which could hold the key to not only future deaths, but the reason why they might be occurring around Thorn’s son. A classic story with an undisputed legacy stretching far out into the genre, this godfather of creepy child films would suit just about any Halloween film night.

B: Hocus Pocus (1993)




Ok, so this isn't strictly a horror film, but it is most definitely a Halloween film and it remains one of the most beloved out there. Starring Bette Midler, Kathy Najimy and Sarah Jessica Parker as the Sanderson sisters, witches first killed back in the 17th century but brought back when a virgin lights the Black-Flamed Candle. What follows is a riot of fish-out-of-water comedy, witch-themed songs, talking cats and a particularly loveable zombie. Midler gets all the best lines: 'I've always wanted a child and now I think I'll have one… ON TOAST' but Najimy and Parker also get their fair share of comedy moments. It's one of those rare films that can be enjoyed by adults and kids alike and for me, this is the first film I watch once we get into Halloween season. In fact, I can probably pinpoint my first viewing of this film as the moment that I completely fell in love with All Hallow's Eve.


J: Poltergeist (1982)

Another top ranking horror film in the list, Poltergeist was produced and co-written by movie world legend Steven Spielberg. The basic plot outline sees a family’s home invaded by ghosts after the disappearance of their young daughter. Sure, it’s probably not the scariest film of all time, certainly not in 2012, but it’s definitely worth seeing for the sheer legacy born from it. Ever heard a reference to houses built on ancient burial sites? Poltergeist. Creepy TVs and electrical noises? Poltergeist. Modern haunted houses story? Yep, Poltergeist again. Watch for the first time with another horror fan so that you can nudge each other excitedly every time you recognise a familiar trope or key camera technique.

B: Cabin in the Woods (2012)

Sometimes a film comes along that is so original, so entertaining and so much fun that you just want to run up and hug the film-makers. Ok, my enduring love for Joss Whedon probably helps, but Cabin in the Woods is, quite simply, one of the best films of 2012. Initially shelved due to financial difficulties, it looked as if CitW would never be seen on the big screen but fortunately it arrived and brought with it the best love letter to the horror genre since Scream. The first two acts of the film are both generic and enigmatic with the doomed college kids manipulated into all the horror cliches we know and love by a mysterious corporation. Then there's the final act, which really has to be seen to be believed. Future blockbuster horrors are really going to have to up their game. 


J: Jeepers Creepers (2001)

Victor Salva’s story focuses on siblings Trish and Darry's discovery of ‘The Creeper’, an ancient monster which feeds on human flesh, ritualistically sewing body parts together. There's a great early performance from Justin Long too and the sibling dialogue between the central pair is extremely well-written. Sure it’s not the greatest plot, and the film itself is nowhere near as terrifying or as innovative as other contributors to this list, but it has always proved popular with thrill and horror fans alike.  Even if ironically, and I promise you, you’ll never hear the song ‘Jeepers Creepers’ in quite the same way again. BEATNGU. 

B: Psycho (1960)


The screeching violins may now be employed for every comical 'oh look he's a bit mad' moment in television and everyone knows about Norman Bates and his curious relationship with his mother, but Psycho still remains one of the true originals and best. Alfred Hitchcock took a big gamble in Psycho, killing off his main star, Janet Leigh, fairly early in the film (a trick that is still repeated now) and having a shy, charming yet still alarmingly bonkers serial killer as the villain. The effects may not have aged particularly well (Abergast's tumble down the stairs in particular) but the almost constant tension from the very beginning make this truly a horror film for the ages. It's also notable for the fact that it is the first film to ever feature a flushing toilet on screen. Not quite as terrifying as Norman's wig but there you go. 


J: The Fog (1980)

John Carpenter’s film, his first commercial success after the runaway hit Halloween, is a firm fan favourite. The residents of Antonio Bay, a lonely Californian town, are busy putting together celebrations for the town’s centennial, when life around town takes a turn for the sinister, culminating in the onset of a thick, creepy fog sweeping in from the sea in a way which can only be described as unnatural. As the local death toll mounts, the locals must figure out who and what is seeking revenge, with all signs seemingly pointing towards the local church. A great achievement in suspense and score, The Fog provides the perfect edge-of-your-seat tension, as well as giving plenty of reasons to leave the 2005 remake well alone. 

B: Scream (1996)

By the 90s, the horror genre was in a bit of a bad way after the originality of 70s slashers became oft-imitated but never bettered and the 80s video nasties controversy saw censorship go a bit overboard. Then came Wes Craven's Scream, the first majorly self-referential horror film, deeply embedded in the history of the genre, whilst pushing it into new and more creative places. Kevin Williamson's script took many of the now-established cliches and weaved them into an innovative and entertaining slasher that rejuvenated the genre for the rest of the decade. Whilst the franchise has become another sad case of diminishing returns, Scream remains an enduring fan favourite. Just remember the rules; don't have sex, don't drink or smoke and never, ever say you'll be right back.

J: Blair Witch Project (1999)

Slated by many though it is, The Blair Witch Project is unarguably the mother of all found footage films. Easily paving the way for around a quarter of the films on this list, the psychological horror follows a group of intrepid students as they report on local legend, the Blair Witch. Naturally, their report leads them to spend several lonely nights alone in the woods. Naturally things start to go awry, with the group dynamic becoming progressively more fraught just as the proverbial noises begin to go bump in the night, and naturally, this being part of the old school of found footage- we never really see anything particularly interesting. It is, however, a tense ride none the less, and worth giving the time of day, or indeed night to for the sense of legacy alone. Especially if you’re a found footage freak like me.

B: The Mist (2007)

Like some of the other films featured on this list, The Mist sees a group of mismatched individuals taking refuge in cramped location to avoid a dangerous menace. In this case though, it's perhaps not what is outside that is the most terrifying. Frank Darabont's film is arguably the best adaptation of a Stephen King story (sorry Kubrick) and goes for character development and atmosphere instead of shock factors and outright gore. The performances really sell this film, particularly Thomas Jane as the put-upon central everyman and Marcia Gay Harden, who is chilling as the town's religious zealot, Mrs Carmody. The analysis of human nature and its extremes are the main focus, rather than the bloodthirsty creatures residing in the mist (though of course, they don't help). It also features one of the bravest and most gut-wrenching endings I have ever seen. Seriously, Seven has got NOTHING on The Mist. 




J: The Ring (2002)

A meta-fictional modern classic that falls heavily on the side of post modernism, the 2002 US film version tells the tale of Rachel, a journalist investigating the death of her young cousin after she watched a mysterious tape. Her journey takes her to a variety of locations, including a creepy island, a lonely cabin in the woods and a mental asylum. Breaking down the fourth wall with its suggestion that film footage can have far more of a sinister effect beyond the screen than just to scare you, Gore Verbinski’s The Ring may not always be wholly satisfying, but its intriguing story line and innovative concept make the whole franchise a set of films to remember.

B: Alien (1979) 


Ridley Scott's Alien is well-deserved of its classic status, a sci-fi horror that abandons the more stereotypical shiny spaceships in favour of a gritty, sweaty and downright unpleasant mining ship, The Nostromo. Despite its titular status, the alien remains largely unseen for the majority of the film, instead dropping from ceilings or jumping out of vents. The latter in particular, never fails to make me jump, no matter how many times I've seen it. Then of course there is the iconic chest-bursting scene, the worst case of indigestion ever committed to celluloid, and still one of the most effective examples of body horror in film. And then there's Sigourney Weaver; her Ellen Ripley isn't the most likeable character of the crew, nor the most prevalent, but her humanity is what makes her such a compelling heroine, singing to herself to keep calm while trying to defeat the acid-blooded menace that just killed her entire crew. Saving the cat was a bit of an odd decision though. 


J: Paranormal Activity (2007) 

Speaking of found footage, no recent horror movie list would be complete without at least a nod to the Paranormal Activity franchise. With the first film released in 2007, several more have since followed- the most recent being Paranormal Activity 4 this year. In the first movie, young couple Katie and Micah use a camcorder in an attempt to figure out what is haunting their home and more specifically, what is haunting Katie. Brilliantly exploiting modern human fears of unexplained noises in the night, the franchise is a great example of the modern American horror film’s post 9-11 obsession with the idea of the home under threat. An idea worth thinking about as you sit there on the edge of your seat, marvelling at how scary an ordinary bedroom can suddenly become when the lights are turned out.


B: 30 Days of Night (2007) 

Vampires have undergone a bit of a transformation recently, thanks in no small part to the atmosphere-destroying Twilight Saga, but whilst teenage girls with little interest in horror pine over the sparkly ones (seriously, glitter??), we'd like to go back to what vampires are supposed to be; nasty, evil and brutal killers. 30 Days of Night is a really interesting take on the vampire genre, set in a town which has to go without sunlight for one month of the year, making it the perfect place for Danny Huston's head vamp and his cronies to set up shop. While the timeline of the film is a bit obscure (it seems to go from having been a couple of days to the end of the month in a couple of scenes), there's no denying that the film is a well-crafted, suspenseful and tragic tale of a group of people attempting to survive a massacre. 


J: Insidious (2010)

A more recent release brought to us last year by the makers of Saw and Paranormal Activity, this film is a particular favourite of mine. Referencing old horror movies and techniques throughout, this truly terrifying movie about a haunted family chased from house to house by demons encapsulates all the very best points of its creators’ other projects. As in Paranormal Activity, we have a haunted house set-up, but crucially, as in Saw, Insidious holds nothing back, showing us every demon, ghost and ghoul in full. Incredibly, even when you’ve seen the monsters several times, I guarantee you’ll still be scared. Watch for double takes galore and a refreshingly modern, yet cleverly nostalgic horror experience that won’t leave you for days.


B: Frankenstein (1931)

Though this version of Frankenstein bears little resemblance to the novel on which it is based (a fact which irks me as Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is my favourite book), I cannot deny my affection for this iconic horror film. As one of the jewels in the crown of Hollywood's early horror era that also saw films like The Mummy and Dracula, Frankenstein is an enduring classic, referenced constantly and instantly recognisable. It employs many of now-standard tropes such as the Gothic castle, a rather impractical lack of lighting and your traditional mad scientist but it still remains, over 80 years later, an enduring classic. And, lest we forget, without this film, we would not have Mel Brooks' Young Frankenstein (which is one of the best comedies ever. But that's for another list). IT'S ALIVE!! 


J: The Shining (1980)

A Stanley Kubrick classic, The Shining, based on the Stephen King novel of the same name, has well earned its position as ‘classic’ psychological horror. After taking a job as a caretaker in an isolated, off-season hotel, writer Jack Torrance, famously played by Jack Nicholson, descends into madness as he and his family are trapped inside the haunted building during a snowstorm. Worthy of a watch for any horror fan or indeed any film fan, The Shining is both beautifully and innovatively shot, as well as genuinely spine-tingling. On the count of three… Heeeeeeere’s Johnny!!

B: Horror of Dracula (1958)


Like many adaptations of Bram Stoker's novel, Horror of Dracula plays fast and loose with its source material, taking what it can use and abandoning the rest. It's the first of a series of films by the excellent Hammer House of Horror and is widely regarded as one of its best. With Christopher Lee donning the infamous red and black cloak, Peter Cushing as the vampire's nemesis, Abraham Van Helsing and enough bloody glorious Technicolor, it's one of the most memorable of Dracula adaptations and set up many of the tropes that would later be mimicked and mocked in films such as Dracula: Dead and Loving It. That it is over sixty years old and has aged far better than its more recent relative, Francis Ford Coppola's Dracula, is a testament to Hammer's reputation as a quality purveyor of foggy, Gothic creature features.

J: The Last Exorcism (2010)

A more recent exorcism focused movie outing, this film differs from its, let’s face it, many ancestors, in that it combines the big ideas associated with religious imagery along with the more personal, psychological nature of the found footage technique. Directed by German filmmaker Daniel Stamm, The Last Exorcism focuses on Reverend Cotton Marcus, a priest who, having misplaced his faith, has become famous for performing what appear to be exorcisms. After agreeing to take part in a documentary aiming to expose the fakery behind exorcism rituals, Marcus chooses the case of Nell, a Louisiana farm girl allegedly butchering animals in her sleep. As the case builds, Marcus is forced to re-think his beliefs. Featuring some truly inspired contortion scenes, an interesting plotline and some great performances, The Last Exorcism is something of a must see for fans of the genre.

B: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)

The narrative of a group of teens going on a nice summer's drive before extreme violence ensues is a story so often used that it is easy to forget that The Texas Chainsaw Massacre is one of the original and best films of that type. There is a very good reason why it ranks so highly on various Scariest Movie lists and it has more to do with the audience watching than it does the film itself. Because of Tobe Hooper's masterful direction, a lot of the horror in TCM isn't actually seen, but is rather suggested through a series of clever edits and sound effects. You may think you've seen someone's arm severed by a chainsaw but you don't see it on screen. It's a wonderfully grimy and nasty film that never fails to make me feel a little sick. 


J: REC (2007)

Right, frankly I’m going to go out on a limb with this film. I’m more than prepared, as both a devout horror fan and fellow Buffery-er, to stand here before you and claim this to be one of the greatest horror films of all time. There, I’ve said it. Be sure to watch it in the original Spanish for a found footage zombie treat so scary you’ll want to turn it off, or at the very least put a light on. The film depicts a young TV reporter’s attempt to break the big time with a report accompanying the local fire brigade to an emergency at a local apartment block. But all is not what it seems, and before our protagonists can so much as blink, let alone get away, the building has been locked down and quarantined. They must try to get to the bottom of what’s going on, try to help each other, and above all- try to survive. An absolute treat, but not one for the faint hearted.

B: The Descent (2005)

For a person with slight claustrophobia issues and a real dislike of dark, scary caverns, Neil Marshall's The Descent was quite simply horrific for me from start to finish. It probably didn't help that I first watched it on my laptop, on my own, in a power cut, but nevertheless, that film is downright creepy. Following a group of friends on a spelunking expedition gone wrong, The Descent is remarkable in many ways, not least for featuring a cast of women who's main role isn't actually to get their kit off. The underground setting also allows for some particularly creative scares, taking full advantage of the lack of light and already terrifying rocky crevices. It's also relentless, taking off at a fast pace and never really letting you catch your breath. It certainly put me off spelunking for life.




J: The Descent II (2009)

Yes, we know The Descent is already on the list, but frankly both films deserve their place on this Halloween run-down. The sequel, which, in a welcome departure from regular film franchise fare actually has a free standing story of its own, sees the first film’s Sarah, played with competence and true star quality by Shauna Macdonald, heading back down into the caves at the behest of local authorities in order to uncover what really happened down there. Just as jumpy, claustrophobic and disturbingly cynical as its predecessor, the franchise earns its accolade of the very best in British horror all over again.

B: Saw (2004)


The Saw franchise may have gone on to increasingly bigger and not-better things, it cannot be denied that the first film was a startlingly original and twisted horror. Morally skewed characters are always more interesting than their easily categorised counterparts and you find your loyalties shifting between the two main characters constantly. Through the central two-hander with Cary Elwes and writer-actor Leigh Whannell and several jaw-wrenching flashbacks, it introduced the world to the fiendish games of Jigsaw. Perhaps Saw's greatest draw though is that it not only asks horrible, catch-22 style questions of its characters, but also of its audience. Would you saw through your own foot to save your life? And again, like many others on this list, the film is made all the more fantastic thanks to its completely unexpected and truly brilliant ending.

J: Final Destination (2000)

Whilst later sequels have been questionable to say the least, the original Final Destination film provides an interesting concept in the idea of ‘Death’ as vengeful, almost human figure, and the ways in which we can therefore cheat it. After a handful of students find themselves the sole survivors of a disastrous plane accident, by virtue of a ghostly premonition by one of their number, they must become increasingly clever in order to escape the death they avoided the first time around. The film’s genius lies in the fact that, whilst the idea of Death needed to patch up its broken design when humans evade its plan is a very human, very ordered idea, inanimate objects in the characters’ surroundings become its weapons of choice in the increasingly inventive death set pieces. And when you’re sat alone at night in a cluttered room, that suddenly seems a very novel, and very scary idea indeed. (B: Also, Final Destination 2 is one of the best horror sequels ever. I'll never look at lorries carrying logs the same way again.)




B: Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

For me, Nightmare on Elm Street is the film that everyone used to watch when their parents weren't looking, the kind of film that cropped up at sleepovers when you definitely weren't allowed to watch it. Didn't stop us though. But sleepovers are really not the best place to watch this particular film, what with Freddie Kreuger being some kind of freaky dream-master able to kill you in your sleep. What I love about this film is the sheer 80s-ness of it from the clothes, the hair and the soundtrack. Then of course, there's an early appearance by Johnny Depp who gets a weird, bed-sucking, fountain-of-blood type death. So that's cool. Though the franchise has gone on and on (and on... and on...), the original is still a great watch, particularly if you're not supposed to be watching it in the first place.

Honourable Mentions


Because we couldn't include everything we wanted to, there's just a quick list here to point you in the direction of some of our other favourites:

The Fly, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Rosemary's Baby, Don't Look Now, The Birds, Cloverfield, My Bloody Valentine 3D, The Thing, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, Nosferatu, Dawn of the Dead... We could go on forever...

Think we've missed anything? Please leave us your suggestions below; we're always looking out for new horrors that need a quality cushion to hide behind.

So whatever you're doing to celebrate the 31st, have a fantastic night and scare yourselves silly. Trick or treat!

- Jen and Becky

Friday, 26 October 2012

THEATRE REVIEW: Scenes From An Execution





 The National Theatre being, well the National Theatre, ‘greatness’ is expected from the productions it presents.

With this in mind, I felt more than happy to take a friend along last week to see a play neither of us knew anything about, save its title, cast and its location. Said play was Howard Barker’s Scenes From An Execution, directed in this instance by Tom Cairns.

Barker’s script acquaints us with Galactia (Fiona Shaw), an eccentric, determined and notably female artist, in her attempt to paint what she really wants to paint, her own unique vision of a battle scene, under the sinister yet just about well-meaning tyranny of her powerful patron, Tim McInnerny’s Urgentino. Just as infamous throughout her home city of Venice for her unsupported chest and lovers as she is for the quality of her work, Galactia is distressed to find herself increasingly attached to her young lover, Carpeta (Jamie Ballard) as the pressure from the powers that be to make her Art more sympathetic to political causes mounts.

Upon first glance, this might appear to be a simple ‘woman versus state’ story. But it’s much more than that. For one thing, Galactia is far too three dimensional a character. She battles with her feelings, her age, her daughters, her sexuality, her own creative temperament as well as society’s view of her just as much, if not more than she locks horns with her interfering sponsor. Scenes From An Execution is also far more philosophical than a linear individual versus Government narrative, questioning the very nature of Art itself, the importance of ‘the eye of the beholder’, as well as loyalties personal, professional and political.

Not least of all is Shaw’s mesmerising portrayal of the artist. Her scenes with Tim McInnerny in particular, are electric to the extreme that, strong as the rest of the cast are, scenes in which these two do not appear seem dull in comparison. Phoebe Nicholls is compelling as Rivera, the Art critic, a character which manages to tie several strands of the plot together quite tidily, as well as throw open an entirely new set of questions about Art itself as both a discipline and pleasure. 

Speaking of tidily, it does feel as if the play ends just a little too neatly. Happy endings and smiles all around, whilst leaving the audience on a high, doesn’t entirely seem to suit the questioning, somewhat subversive subject matter of a play that suggests we re-consider authority and opinion.

The production values, however are fabulous and, in choosing subtlety over swagger where needed, perfectly give sense of scale whilst never appearing overdone. Hildegard Bechtler’s design demonstrates is especially brilliant in its treatment of the narrator figure, as well as with Galactia’s painting itself. There’s also a charming contrast between natural imagery, such as the onstage rocks used as beds on a few occasions, and the square shapes of the set’s room spaces, mirroring the inherent contradictions and conflicts of the play’s own content.

Whilst the play does lean towards the side of academic interest, whether or not you find yourself particularly interested in Art, and its relationship with the world it depicts, the performances alone are worth your ticket price. Greatness has long been the expected norm of productions at the National, and here, as the play itself warns us, ‘greatness beckons’.
****

Scenes From An Execution is running until Sunday 9th December, at the National’s Lyttleton Theatre.


-      Jen

You can read more of Jen's writing here: https://memyselfandtheothers.wordpress.com/

Or you can follow her on twitter here: https://twitter.com/jenniferklarge

Monday, 22 October 2012

TV REVIEW: Merlin - The Death Song of Uther Pendragon

There's something rotten in the state of Camelot as an old cast member returns looking a little worse for wear, Arthur and Merlin are forced to face a mutual foe and it's Percival who gets his shirt off this time. 


After stepping in to save a woman accused of magic, Arthur (Bradley James) is given a gift, the Horn of Cathbad and despite both Merlin (Colin Morgan) and Gaius (Richard Wilson) warning against it, uses it to contact his dead father, Uther (Anthony Stewart Head). The meeting doesn't exactly go as planned and after breaking the key rule of not looking back (nice bit of Greek mythology mashing up there), Arthur accidentally invites the unrestful spirit back to Camelot. Uther isn't exactly best pleased at how Arthur is running things and goes on a bit of rampage, sending furniture and Gwen (Angel Coulby) flying around the castle.

With the excellent two-parter that kicked off the series, Merlin could have gone rapidly downhill, just through sheer comparison to Arthur's Bane and in previous years, it probably would have done. We would have had a guest star doing an uncanny troll impression who everyone apart from Merlin believes to be a good guy. There'd be lots of sneaking about, exasperated explanations and probably an ill-conceived fart joke to top it all off. Not with this episode though thankfully as the writers decided to pitch Merlin into a good old-fashioned ghost story. Rather than the expansive storyline of the opening two-parter,

It was handled well and the budget clearly went on a lot of the special effects for the episode which benefitted greatly. Technically, the episode has been one of the strongest I've seen for the entire series and really helped to sell the ghost story aspect. There's always the risk that a floating axe can look a bit comical but the construction of those scenes was such that the tension was so great, you didn't really notice the axe flying but were trying to guess on whom it was going to land. It was also genuinely quite creepy, something that the new later time on a Saturday has allowed to happen with jump scares used for both comic and horror effects. The use of sound was particularly noteworthy in Gwen's chase scene; there was a complete absence of music allowing the visuals to create that tense atmosphere. And Uther looks damn scary in blue.

The return of Anthony Head is most welcome; his Uther was always an intriguing study of suppressed rage and paranoia, here brought to the fore in the scene with Bradley James. The theme of the episode was very much about escaping your parents' shadow and carving your own way, encapsulated in the first meeting between father and son. The balance of the scene was perfectly pitched with the seething anger of Uther matched with the reserved calm of Arthur, standing up to his father with his own beliefs. With Uther's almost-revelation just before he disappeared, does this mean we're getting closer to Arthur finding out? After all, the episode repeatedly referred to Arthur's tolerance and his compassion with the old woman at the beginning of the episode demonstrated that he might be ready to hear the truth about his closest friend.



The big confrontation though, was between Uther and Merlin in the big showdown and what a satisfying battle it was. Uther's complete and utter rejection of magic and any persecution of anyone who practised it was the reason behind Merlin's dual life so when it came to the two facing off, you just knew that magic was going to appear. Colin Morgan's performances don't tend to be of the showy variety, often acting as the foil to the other actors, but here he completely stole the scene away from Anthony Head in just a one line rebuttal to Uther's 'You are nothing but a serving boy' - 'I am much more than that'. I'm not going to lie, I cheered a bit.


It was an important development for the character, having his revenge on his would-be oppressor and Morgan did a fantastic job of conveying both the relief and vindictive joy of sharing his secret. With Uther's almost-revelation just before he disappeared, does this mean we're getting closer to Arthur finding out? After all, the episode repeatedly referred to Arthur's tolerance and his compassion with the old woman at the beginning of the episode demonstrated that he might be ready to hear the truth about his closest friend.

Both Morgan and James gave truly commendable performances this week, both excelling in the comic scenes (did I spy a Prince of Thieves reference with the spoon threat?) and the more emotional moments towards the end. Their two confrontation scenes with Uther were sublime, allowing their respective character arcs to become more apparent than before. Merlin finally gets his revenge on the King who forced him to transform his identity while Arthur realises just how cruel and vindictive Uther could be and how different from his father he actually was. 

All in all, it was a pretty stonking episode of Merlin, focusing on the central pair and their respective abilities to move out of the shadows of those that oppressed them. We only got a brief look at new knight of the Round Table, Mordred this time and Percival (Tom Hopper) was the only Sir to get any major screen time after a particularly odd encounter with an axe. Next week sees the return of Morgana, who's probably still very angry.

- Becky

You can read Becky's review of Merlin - Arthur's Bane Part Two here.

Follow Becky on Twitter @beckygracelea
Or follow her blog beckygracelea.wordpress.com

Wednesday, 17 October 2012

THEATRE REVIEW: A Chorus Of Disapproval




I don’t think I went along to Trevor Nunn’s revival of A Chorus Of Disapproval in altogether the best frame of mind. Slightly ill, distracted and sat behind one of the Harold Pinter’s infamous pillars, the evening did not start especially well.

The play itself, written by Alan Ayckbourn, and first performed at the National Theatre in 1984, sees the Pendon Light Operatic Society try, amateur in every possible sense, try and largely fail, to put on a decent production of John Gay’s The Beggar’s Opera. When relationships begin to break down, and the actors’ lives becomes intertwined and tangled through affairs and backstabbing, all hell breaks loose in the rehearsal room, with the ‘on-stage’ action mirroring life in the wings.

Starring Rob Brydon as the production’s well-meaning but ultimately mark-missing director, Ashley Jensen as his underappreciated wife and Nigel Harman as the shy new star in town- there are plenty of big names in this production. Brydon, undeniably the biggest crowd draw of all, is excellent, visibly enjoying his character, Dafydd Ap Llewellyn’s obsessions and ambitions, expertly invoking them in every heavily accented line.

Jensen gives a moving, sweet performance as the sexually frustrated and lonely Hannah, with Nigel Harman strong, but not especially remarkable opposite her.  There are some great performances to be found elsewhere, Daisy Beaumont and Northern Broadsides’ Barrie Rutter in particular, along with a consistent and promising West End debut from new talent Georgia Brown. There are some fantastic one liners and great comic set pieces- such as a scene in Act 2 which sees the cuckolded and oblivious Dafydd charging about the said cuckold and his wife shouting up into the circle and worrying about the intricacies of his lighting.

As such, there are some lovely moments of well-timed comic theatre to be found in A Chorus of Disapproval, but, overall, there were too many polite titters and not enough belly laughs for my liking. Perhaps I was put off by the pillar and the over loud teenagers behind me, who insisted on repeating every punch line back to themselves at least twice. 
 Perhaps I wasn’t in quite the right mood. Perhaps my experience last week was negatively influenced by my utter delight at the Old Vic’s similarly themed, and better executed Noises Off earlier in the year, coming off badly in the comparison.

Perhaps it was just me.

So by all means I would encourage you to go, laugh and enjoy- it really is worth it for Rob 
Brydon alone- but perhaps don’t go expecting the earth to move.


***
 

A Chorus of Disapproval is at the Harold Pinter Theatre until the 5th January. http://achorusofdisapproval.com/


- Jen



You can read more of Jen's writing here: https://memyselfandtheothers.wordpress.com/

Or you can follow her on twitter here: https://twitter.com/jenniferklarge

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

TV REVIEW: Downton Abbey - Episode Five

The fifth episode of Downton Abbey is both one of the most dramatic so far, and naturally therefore, one of the best. I usually try to avoid major spoilers for my reviews but be warned, there is one massive spoiler here that it would be impossible not to discuss.



The house begins preparing for the arrival of Sybil (Jessica Brown Findlay) and Tom's (Allen Leech) baby while Matthew (Dan Stevens) and Mary (Michelle Dockery) are still longing for the pitter-patter of tiny feet (Oncoming Tragedy Klaxon). Daisy (Sophie McShera) is taking being someone's superior a little too seriously and is yelling at the new kitchenmaid a lot while Anna (Joanne Froggatt) has discovered the evidence that could lead to a pardon for Mr Baaates (Brendan Coyle). The new footman, Jimmy (Ed Speelers) finds himself in a rather compromising situation with the amorous Thomas (Rob James-Collier) thanks to O'Brien's (Siobhan Finneran) plotting. Then as complications start with Sybil's pregnancy, Lord and Lady Grantham (Hugh Bonneville and Elizabeth McGovern) are forced to make a decision that could jeopardise Sybil's health and the baby. How they managed to keep this one secret is anyone's guess, but the episode was so much better for not having a clue about what was just around the corner.

The sense of foreboding was slow to creep up in this episode, most of the focus was on how happy everything was going to be once the next generation of the Downton dynasty arrived. The construction of the episode was one of its strongest points with ebbs and flows that constantly made you question the outcome, particularly once the baby had been born. Then, there was that scene between Sybil and Cora in which the daughter pleaded with the mother for her help with carrying out her husband's wishes for the child. Suddenly, the third daughter's future looked pretty certain and not in a rosy, everything's going to be all right kind of way and in one of the bravest moves the show has ever made, we saw the departure of Sybil, who was possibly one of the most beloved characters.



It's a brave plot point for two reasons; firstly, as I mentioned last week, it shakes up the well-worn path that Downton has been treading this series. We all felt safe because we always knew that everything would always be all right, because it always had been. Well that's now completely out the window and you get the feeling that, for the remaining episodes at least, anything goes. Minor characters have always been dispensable (the footman William for example) but up until now it was always safe to assume that the main characters would survive; Matthew magically recovered his ability to walk and do, erm, other things while Cora survived Spanish flu. Secondly, it's going to make the family dynamic all the more interesting. After all, who is going to defend Branson now that Sybil isn't around? I strongly suspect that the usual family loyalties are going to start shifting. And when I said I was all for seeing more of Branson, killing off his wife was not exactly what I meant but it nevertheless promises an interesting plot-line for the former chauffeur. 

The death scene itself was slow and heart-wrenching, from Branson and Cora's pleas for Sybil to stay with them to Lord Grantham's disbelief at the sudden turn of events, and the scenes that followed just added to the tragedy. I personally could no longer hold it together after the brief scene between the Dowager Countess and Carson in which the usually formidable Countess weeped openly, just for a second. Maggie Smith has always been the standout performer in Downton but this moment was so well-judged and so measured that it made an already galling episode even more so. With people group-grieving everywhere, it would have been easy for one actor to pantomime it and try and outdo the others, but each member of the cast gave a great performance in the final scenes of the episode, particularly James-Collier showing a rare moment of compassion in Thomas and Leech, as the grief-stricken husband.

It's the biggest upset we've yet had on the series and it has set up some very interesting narratives for the rest of the series. With Branson now the only link to Lord Grantham's grandchild, there's naturally going to be even more conflict. Elsewhere in the episode, there's other troubles on the horizon with Mary and Matthew most obviously with their baby struggles but also with the estate itself. Something tells me things are only going to get worse at Downton now. And let's face it, none of us would have it any other way.

- Becky

You can read Becky's review of Episode Four here.

Follow Becky on Twitter @beckygracelea
Or follow her blog beckygracelea.wordpress.com