Showing posts with label Chris Pine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Pine. Show all posts
Monday, 25 July 2016
FILM REVIEW: Star Trek Beyond
Star Trek holds a special place in my heart, as it has done for many people for its 50 year history, combining thoughtful science fiction with adventurous derring do, characters we have all come to love and a positive, progressive ethos that spoke of the best of humanity. I reviewed Star Trek Into Darkness here back in 2013 and it was written, like this one, in that initial post-viewing glow. I liked aspects of Into Darkness then, but over time, the frustrations I spoke of during that film deepened. I watched it once more and came to resent it a great deal. I'm still not over it.
Into Darkness made the mistake of infecting Star Trek with a cynicism the show rarely possessed and the way they approached the story, the bizarre retread of Khan and the appropriation of Trek history was such a disappointment that I was ready to outright ignore the Kelvin timeline and await Bryan Fuller's TV series. I speak of this now to provide some context to my emotions going into Star Trek Beyond. I've been deeply reserved throughout the marketing campaign, growing more cautiously optimistic when the early positive buzz started filtering through, but still very hesitant.
It is, therefore, a joy to report that not only did I enjoy Star Trek Beyond, but it has managed to almost entirely renew my faith in the Kelvin timeline; STID means I will never be 100%, but hey, this is one hell of a comeback.
Captain James T. Kirk is three years into his five year mission of discovery and boldly going with the rest of the Enterprise crew. He's a little weary and considering making a promotional step that would take him out of the captain's chair and behind a desk. When a distressed refugee arrives at the Yorktown starbase (a truly phenomenal piece of design) needing help to retrieve her crew, it is, naturally, the Enterprise that is tasked with the rescue mission. They head off into uncharted space and straight into a trap that scatters the crew. Kirk, Bones, Spock et al. are forced to combine their smarts to outwit their rather angry opponent and get the crew of the Enterprise back together again.
What strikes me most about Beyond is that it feels, from the start, like a Trek story. The world around them has a tangible history to it, allowing for subtle callbacks to the Federation's history that fans will understand. Unlike the heavy-handed reference-flinging of its predecessor, Beyond simply allows its world to exist rather than feeling the need to consistently and loudly point it out. Much of this comes for an inherent respect of the property that they're working with, helped enormously by Simon Pegg and Doug Jung's screenplay. The love of Trek practically bursts through the screen on occasion and it's hard not to get swept up in such enthusiasm.
And, like the best Trek tales, Beyond manages to combine its adventurous tone with a thematic weight and properly worked character arcs. The key message here, oft-repeated, is the idea of 'strength in unity,' what the Federation stands for across the galaxy. The bad guy, Krall (an imposing Idris Elba), believes it's all empty rhetoric and that his particular brand of conflicted, battle-scarred individuality is the way to go. It sets up an intriguing opposite to Kirk who acknowledges the need for his crew at all times; he's never the individual hero here, but part of a team.
Justin Lin's direction yields some beautiful moments of sublimity including a gorgeous shot of Kirk surveying recently wrought destruction from a position of powerlessness. But Lin also can't seem to keep still. There are great looping camera movements around characters or through Yorktown, all of which look very pretty, but becomes a little tiresome as the film goes on. The editing during the action sequences falls into one of the common traps of never quite being able to convey what is happening. Some fights are more than a little confusing, which is a shame during some of the higher concept action sequences as there's some inventive choreography going on there.
When it comes to the cast, Chris Pine is one of the major strengths of Beyond, depicting the loneliness of command early in the film before slotting instantly into the leadership role as the narrative demands. He anchors the core conflict of individuality versus community in his performance that, at times, feels Shatner-esque in tone or expression, but without resorting to the parody of the character that the other two films lapsed into on occasion. This Kirk is a product of his father's death and all the anxieties that come with that and it's in the little moments that that comes forth, such as a close up of his hand nervously gripping his chair arm during a battle sequence that feels deeply human. It's not all drama though; the wicked sense of humour gets a chance to shine frequently.
That sense of humour spills into the other characters too, especially Bones and Spock. Karl Urban and Zachary Quinto are the most Bonesy and Spockish they've ever been; their expanded relationship is given the time to explore their respective roles as representatives of the heart and the head. They have a conversation about mortality, a theme of the film that gets a little lost in the action elsewhere, but here feels like a near-perfect microcosm of how they work together as the clash of heart and hea. The Bones-Kirk-Spock trifecta is also seen more and carries a real sense of how the trio's inter-dependence becomes essential to their relationship. It's the closest they've come to matching their Prime timeline counterparts and it bodes well for future instalments.
The other crew members are served well with Sulu and Uhura each getting their turn in the spotlight. The use of Uhura as the audience proxy with Krall is a clever play on her communications role, her conversations with him offering us insight into his history and motivations. The late Anton Yelchin's enthusiastic performance as the adorable Chekov gives the film its bittersweet note and he's a joy once again here, all badly pronounced Vs and gesticulation. Newcomer Sofia Boutella's Jaylah slots in well to the existing line-up and allows for that strength in unity theme to be played out in another format as she learns to work with the crew.
Above all, the message of hope that runs through Beyond feels needed now more than ever. There is no problem here that can't be solved with a little ingenuity, no obstacle that feels insurmountable if everyone is working together. In the current unsettled political climate, it feels particularly timely. The threats are clear and present, the stakes high, but you have faith, just like Kirk, that the crew will find a way out of whatever dilemma they've wandered into because that's exactly what they're good at. It's an enormously positive message and a love letter to the power of a united population. And that, to me, is quintessential Star Trek.
Now if I could just stop thinking about Madness every time I read the title...
- Becky
Follow @AssortedBuffery on Twitter
Or like our Facebook page
Labels:
Anton Yelchin,
Chris Pine,
Doug Jung,
Idris Elba,
Joe Taslim,
John Cho,
Justin Lin,
Karl Urban,
Leonard Nimoy,
Simon Pegg,
Sofia Boutella,
Star Trek Beyond,
Zachary Quinto,
Zoe Saldana
Friday, 23 January 2015
FILM REVIEW: Into The Woods
After watching Into The Woods, Rob Marshall’s adaptation of Stephen
Sondheim and James Lapine’s 1987 musical, it seems to me that ‘The Woods’
aren’t so much a place, but rather a state of mind. A place of suspended
disbelief, where stories are mixed up and characters wander in and out of
narratives as they please.
By default, some people will gel with this quite happily, where others
won’t. It’s worth remembering that, despite the variety of upside-down,
what-happened-next fairytales available for our viewing pleasure, Into the
Woods was very much a forerunner back in the day.
But back to the film. The ‘Prologue’, introduces us to James Corden’s baker and his wife
(Emily Blunt) a childless couple, who are one day visited by a witch (Meryl
Streep) who claims responsibility for the curse on their house which has
rendered them childless all these years. They are set the challenge of
retrieving certain magical items (you can probably hazard a guess) by the next
blue moon in three days’ time in order for the curse to be lifted. Along the
way, they meet some familiar fairy-tale faces, albeit with a twist each time,
from an indecisive Cinderella (Anna Kendrick), to an arrogant, slightly sinister
Prince Charming (Chris Pine), to an emotional Rapunzel (Mackenzie Mauzy) via
Jack (Daniel Huttlestone) of beanstalk fame, whose best friend is a cow.
Personally I’d be hard pushed not to enjoy something Sondheim has had
even the smallest involvement in, as the many questionable performances of
‘Being Alive’ I’ve watched on youtube is a testament to, but arguably as strong
a draw with this production is the all-star cast. And that proved a worthy
notion, although not entirely in the way you would expect. Most of the
pre-release hype has been focused almost entirely on Meryl Streep, calling to
mind that highly appropriate Tina Fey and Amy Poehler Golden Globes joke ‘Meryl
Streep can’t be here tonight… She has the flu – and I hear she’s amazing in it’.
And amazing indeed she is, veering between cackling, spell-casting and
flashing her disturbingly long nails –all your traditional witchy activities –
and genuine, heart-felt laments at the loss of her beauty and youth. Oh and her
magic beans, of course. She’s quite keen on them. Her performance of the
powerful ‘Last Midnight’, a typically complex Sondheim number full of quirky
rhymes (see ‘witch’ and ‘hitch’, ‘hunch’ and ‘bunch’) and neat summaries of
just about everyone else in the plot along the way, is particularly
awe-inspiring.
But I’d be willing to bet that it is Emily Blunt’s performance audiences
are still talking about on the bus home. She plays the childless baker’s wife
with vulnerability, warmth and vitality, all whilst cracking out a singing
voice I certainly had no idea she possessed, providing some really gorgeous
harmonies in the group numbers in particular.
And it’s not just Blunt who takes us by surprise. Chris Pine’s
performance of the out-loud ego-trip ‘Agony’ alongside Rapunzel’s Prince Billy
Magnussen was an unexpected triumph (‘Agony! Far more painful than yours, when
you know she would go with you, if there only were doors’), as were almost all
songs performed by the younger actors - Lilla Crawford as Little Red Riding
Hood and Les Miserables’ Daniel
Huttlestone as Jack. Film viewers know Anna Kendrick has a lovely voice through
Pitch Perfect, but it’s great to see
her stretching her cinematic comfort zone a bit here, and using those Tony
nominated Broadway vocal chords to full effect.
You can also play an excellent game of ‘spot the character actor’ in Act
II, if Johnny Depp (who else?)’s performance as the infamous big bad wolf
wasn’t enough for you.
Marshall has played a sensible game here in striking for the fun, playful
angle in Into The Woods, rather than
overly focusing on the themes of storytelling or the innate darkness in
children’s stories – Cinderella’s ugly sisters cutting off parts of their feet
in order to fit the slipper, anyone? The darker scenes are there, granted, but
they never feel like the main focus.
This is by no means a perfect film, you do get the slight sense at times that there's a little something missing, but you can't quite put your finger on what.
This is by no means a perfect film, you do get the slight sense at times that there's a little something missing, but you can't quite put your finger on what.
With that in mind, if you enter the woods looking for a good time, you
won’t stray far from the path.
★★★★
Jen
@jenniferklarge
Follow @AssortedBuffery on Twitter
Or like our Facebook page
@jenniferklarge
Follow @AssortedBuffery on Twitter
Or like our Facebook page
Tuesday, 14 May 2013
FILM REVIEW: Star Trek Into Darkness
The 2009 reboot of Star Trek was a massive hit, pleasing hardcore Trekkies, casual fans and complete novices alike. With its gimmick of re-setting the timeline of the original franchise, it distanced itself from the existing Star Trek whilst allowing the new group to move off in their own direction. It was an excellent jumping off point with a great cast in place and felt like a bright, shiny new world of Trek to explore. Star Trek Into Darkness therefore, should have had it made and does well to recapture some of the spark that made the reboot such a joy.
This is thanks in large part to the cast, once again excelling in iconic roles and not becoming overshadowed by those who went before. One aspect that the reboot franchise has got right from the start is the dynamic between the crew although they don't spend nearly enough time with each other. A real highlight is the interaction between Kirk, Spock and Karl Urban's metaphor-happy Bones, perfectly re-capturing the humour of the three characters' relationship. Other characters don't quite get the same chance to shine though Scotty (Simon Pegg) is given a little more to do than comic relief this time around. Zoe Saldana's Uhura gets a couple of big moments but it is poor Alice Eve who does her best with very little as Carol Marcus, including a completely unnecessary underwear scene.
The big focus has been on a certain Mr Cumberbatch in all his floppy-haired, swishy-coated glory and he cuts a fine figure, balancing the emotional aspects of John Harrison with the more scenery-chewing villainy that we were all expecting. However, the film is rather surprisingly stolen by Chris Pine who turns in a quieter, yet very affecting performance as the headstrong Kirk. It's largely a film about his journey and so the focus is on Kirk much more as he learns about all the facets of becoming a captain and its difficulties. Pine proves to be more than a worthy foil to Cumberbatch and their scenes together crackle with an energy that deserved more screentime.It is a shame that the same attention to detail that has clearly been paid to the characters was not transferred to the film's plot. There are some big themes in there - exploration vs destruction, the necessity of revenge, terrorism, impending war - but it never feels as if Abrams et.al want to go into these in any detail beyond Kirk's character arc. Likewise, we get plenty of nods to the original series, but they become so frequent, I found myself rolling my eyes whenever one was needlessly inserted into a conversation.
Predictable right from the start, the storyline is telegraphed through various signifiers so twists come too soon and are seen a mile off and as a result, no real danger is felt. At no point in the entire film did I get the sense that the stakes were high or that the crew were in any real danger, lessening the impact of the action scenes somewhat. That is not to say the action scenes are dull, far from it in fact, as some sequences are spectacularly put together (even if one is recycled from the previous film) and the actors, particularly Cumberbatch, impress with their physicality.
Despite this predictability, the first three quarters of the film are wildly entertaining, amusing and thrilling in equal measure. However, this is completely undermined by the final act of the film. Whilst I won't reveal anything at all spoilery, the last thirty minutes sent me into a downward spiral of disappointment and frustration. This falls solely at the feet of screenwriters Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Damien Lindelof who wrap everything up in a conclusion that is not only forecasted from a long way off, but is incredibly lazy and so devoid of originality that it leaves a bitter taste. It's a frustrating shame because everything up until then had been a little flawed, but mostly entertaining. It took just one moment to pull me out of that completely.
Star Trek Into Darkness is proving to be quite divisive and sadly, I find myself on the negative side of the debate. The build-up to its release has been immense and rife with speculation, but the film plays its hand too early and provides an ending that is not at all satisfying.
** (and a half- mainly for Benedict Cumberbatch and Chris Pine)
- Becky
Follow @AssortedBuffery on Twitter
Or like our Facebook page.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

