The
Sign of Three saw Sherlock (Benedict Cumberbatch) face
a case he never thought possible- the curious case of the unwritten best man’s
speech. Having sort of proposed to Mary (Amanda Abbington) in the previous
episode, albeit dramatically diverted at the time by the re-appearance of his
supposedly dead best friend, John Watson (Martin Freeman)’s wedding day has now
arrived. This has left a desperate Sherlock in the tricky situation of having
to not only write an entire speech in which he must emotionally connect with a
room full of tissue ready wedding guests, but, crucially, this is a situation in which he must act normal,
and not like a ‘high functioning sociopath’ for an entire day. Premise
established, the episode proceeds to use said speech as a vehicle for well -timed
flashbacks on the adventures of groom and best man, from the stag do to an
invisible man to a womanising ghost. As the speech trundles on, taking us
from laughter to tears in minutes, so too do the stories of the different
cases, until Sherlock’s dramatic and somewhat inevitable conclusion that a
crime, a murder no less, has been planned for this very day, in this very room.
For now, however, back to the speech. Despite the
fact that the speech itself transpired to be nothing short of a masterpiece,
touchingly delivered and utterly true to the relationship of the three characters
involved, Sherlock’s speech making skills are met with, at best, concern.
Perhaps well founded given his previous behaviour towards any member of the
opposite sex John has shown an interest in. Mrs Hudson Sherlock’s long
suffering landlady, played with a splendid warmth and simplicity, as ever, by Una
Stubbs, finds the concept of Sherlock talking
about a subject other than grisly homicide in front of so many rapt, normal people so hilarious that she can’t
get passed the idea of him reading out the telegrams without breaking down in
fits of laughter so over the top she sounds like a woodland bird being poked
with something hot and pointy, to paraphrase. Sherlock himself isn’t entirely
thrilled with the situation either, with even Watson failing to notice how ‘terrified’
the detective clearly is.
Happily, it falls to the tremendously likeable
Mary to save the day, as she cunningly plays the boys off against each other in
order for them both to be re-assured that the wedding, and indeed life after it
will all end happily, with both feeling all the while feeling comfortably superior that they are
doing the other one a favour. A woman who can outsmart Sherlock and Watson to
boot without having to take her dressing gown off? Nice. Very nice. In fact
nice is exactly what Mary is. As I said a moment ago she really is very
likeable. Not so much fortuitous as utterly crucial to the longevity of the
series, the success of her character has clearly been meticulously discussed
and planned to the nth degree. The requirements were probably something along the lines of, firstly, a character strong enough to hold her own when
talking to the infamous sociopath as well as being a person in her own right,
and finally not to mention somebody John Watson would want to marry. That’s a lot to achieve
in the form of just one fiancée. Fortunately, the writing team, and indeed
Amanda Abbington herself, more than achieve this.
I think it’s fair to say that her real life
marriage to Martin Freeman goes some way towards making their on screen
relationship work, too. The two have a warmth, ease and sense of fun about them
on screen through which they manage to create that rare thing in TV partnerships –
actual genuine seeming chemistry. Given how hand and glove-like Cumberbatch and
Freeman’s performances fit each other, the latter’s relationship with his now
wife really had to be absolutely spot on in order to have a chance at working.
A fantastic performance here, too from Benedict Cumberbatch, who, whilst
allowing us to see a more fragile, silly and ultimately more human side of the
socially awkward sleuth remained 100% true to the man himself, even in this
most uncharacteristic of situations.
The more detective-like elements of the episode
were down played in favour of Sherlock’s old enemy, ‘sentiment’, which may well
have angered some die-hard puzzle-solving fans, but for me there was just the
right amount of background mystery and intrigue. It was as fascinating and
mind-boggling as ever, but didn’t get in the way of either the hilarity of the
stag-do flashbacks, in which we were treated to the rare and totally brilliant
sight of a drunken Sherlock, nor the poignancy of the day itself and Sherlock’s
heart felt congratulations and tributes to the happy couple.
It was the perfect, perfect mix of jokes, tears,
laughter and excitement. Just any
wedding speech should be – although most don’t wind up with an attempted
murder.
But then, that’s what you get when you pick
Sherlock Holmes as your best man.
Jen
Follow @AssortedBuffery on Twitter
Or like our Facebook page.
Or like our Facebook page.

I really looked forward to this one as I love the original story. However, I felt they had Sherlock do some things that broke character, the dancing bit and the 'let's play murder' line was dreadful. I felt like they were just trying to be fun, not well written.
ReplyDelete